If you aren't subscribed yet, head over to my channel and hit the ‘subscribe’ button to get notified of my next video releases.
Consultants are often told that the easiest route to predictable revenue looks like this:
Get invited into a meeting with a senior decision-maker. Ask brilliant questions. Diagnose the real problem. Send a proposal. Turn the project into a monthly retainer.
It sounds simple.
For an established authority with years of reputation behind them, it can be.
For many solo consultants and fractionals, it is one of the hardest ways to win the first piece of work.
The problem is not that they lack expertise. The model asks the client to trust too much before they have experienced that expertise.
There is a safer route for both sides.
Make the first decision small, useful and valuable in its own right. Produce a result the client can see. Then earn the next engagement by helping them solve the most important problem the first piece of work reveals.
I call this the 4Es Method:
Easy Entry. Earned Expansion
The first yes is easy because the risk is contained. Every later yes is earned because the value is visible.
This is not an argument against day rates
There is nothing inherently wrong with charging a day rate.
For someone starting a consulting practice, it can be a sensible way to gain experience and build a body of work. Some experts also prefer long contractor engagements. They value the stability and have no interest in building a wider practice.
Both are valid choices.
This model is for the consultant or fractional who wants to move beyond selling time and build a practice around defined client outcomes.
Why the traditional model is harder than the books suggest
The classic discovery-and-proposal model depends on three things that are easy to underestimate.
You need enough authority to get into the room
A chief executive rarely gives an unknown consultant two hours and permission to challenge how the organisation works.
Writers such as Alan Weiss have taught the discovery-led model extremely well. What gets missed is the authority behind it. A recognised expert gets invited into conversations that a newer consultant cannot access yet.
General authority is also becoming less useful. Buyers increasingly want someone known for a specific problem in a specific situation.
You need the skill to diagnose beneath the symptoms
Being excellent at delivery does not automatically make someone excellent at diagnosis.
A serious discovery conversation requires the confidence to push back, work around internal politics and ask questions that may make senior people uncomfortable. Without that skill, the conversation stays at the surface.
The proposal then describes the visible symptom rather than the cause.
You are rarely selling to one person
The image of one consultant persuading one person in the corner office is out of date.
Most meaningful consulting decisions involve several people. Each has different priorities, risks and definitions of success. The person who likes your proposal may not control the budget. The person who controls the budget may not attend the discovery session.
None of this means the model cannot work. It means calling it the easiest route is misleading.
Start with an Easy Entry
An Easy Entry is a focused first engagement with a named outcome, clear boundaries and standalone value.
A one-day workshop can work particularly well.
It is long enough for the client to experience how you think. It is short enough to feel contained. Done properly, it creates something useful even if the client never buys another day from you.
That last point matters.
An Easy Entry must pass the no-regrets test:
> If the relationship ends after this engagement, will the client still be glad they bought it?
If the answer is no, you have created paid discovery for your benefit, not a valuable first engagement for theirs.
Pricing depends on your experience, the importance of the problem and the value of the decision being made. Do not copy someone else’s workshop fee and assume the format alone justifies it.
A workshop that creates the next decision
The workshop has two broad parts.
The morning creates clarity. The afternoon turns that clarity into a set of decisions and possible projects.
Begin with the current and desired position
Help the group establish:
- Where the organisation is now
- Where it wants to get to
- What is blocking progress
- Which evidence supports that view
Clarity has standalone value. Teams often spend months acting on different versions of the same problem. Getting the right people to agree on the starting position can prevent a great deal of wasted work.
Give every stakeholder a voice
At the start of the day, ask each key person for one or two outcomes they want from the session.
Write them where everyone can see them.
Then set expectations with authority. If one outcome can be completed, say so. If another can only be explored, say that too. If a third is clearly a larger project, name it without apologising.
This does two things. It prevents disappointment after the workshop, and it surfaces work that may deserve a separate engagement.
You are not forcing an upsell. You are making the boundaries visible.
Identify the work that bridges the gap
Once the current and desired positions are clear, help the group identify the projects that could move them between the two.
Do not arrive and dismiss everything already in progress. Find at least one existing initiative that could create more value if it were completed or adjusted properly.
That shows judgement. It also stops the workshop turning into theatre in which the consultant has to declare everything broken to justify being there.
Discuss resources before choosing projects
Before the group commits to a list of projects, get them to consider the resources available.
Who has the time to own the work? Which skills exist internally? Where will decisions be made? Which parts require outside support?
This conversation changes the quality of the afternoon. The group stops creating a wish list and starts judging what can actually be delivered - possibly very aware of the potential to get you involved.
Rank the projects and test confidence
Ask the group to rank the projects by importance.
Then ask a harder question:
> How confident are you that the organisation can deliver the highest-priority project with the people and resources currently available?
The gap between importance and confidence is where the next honest engagement may sit.
It may require you. It may require another specialist, a new hire or an agency. Your responsibility is to help the client see the gap accurately, not to make yourself the answer to every problem.
If you want more practical models for building a consulting practice around trust and useful relationships, subscribe to this publication if you haven’t already…
Move from the workshop to an outcome, not a vague retainer
At the end of the workshop, the client should have clarity on its position, a ranked list of projects and an honest view of its ability to deliver them.
Now the conversation can move to Earned Expansion.
Instead of offering a monthly bundle of calls, reports and general support, define the next meaningful outcome over a sensible period. Three months often works well, but the work should set the timeframe. Do not force every problem into a quarter.
For a consultant, the engagement may involve delivering a defined project.
For a fractional, it may involve taking ownership of the outcome and working through the client’s team.
Either way, the agreement needs to state:
- The outcome being pursued
- The evidence that will show movement
- What you will own
- What the client must provide
- What sits outside both parties’ control
- When the next decision will be made
This is not a retainer with a better label.
A retainer often sells continued access.
An outcome engagement sells a defined change with boundaries and evidence.
The client is not paying to keep you around. They are paying for focused responsibility against an agreed priority.
Use the 90-Day Outcome Loop inside the expansion
The 4Es Method explains how the commercial relationship grows.
The 90-Day Outcome Loop explains how the expanded work runs:
1. Define one primary outcome and the responsibilities around it.
2. Deliver through one clear mode: doing the work, building it with the team or advising the people responsible.
3. Demonstrate progress throughout the engagement, not in a rushed report at the end.
4. Decide whether to expand into the next outcome, pause or complete the work.
That final decision matters.
Earned Expansion includes permission to stop. If no important next problem exists, inventing one destroys the trust the model is designed to build.
The truth about recurring revenue
One purchased quarter is not recurring revenue.
It is one paid engagement with the possibility of renewal.
If a client contractually commits to several quarters, those quarters may be contracted recurring revenue. An uncommitted future quarter is not revenue and should not appear in your forecast as if it were sold.
There is another boundary worth protecting.
You can commit to the work, decisions, evidence and responsibilities you control. You cannot guarantee a business result that depends on the client’s actions, market conditions or another supplier.
Outcome-based work becomes credible when those dependencies are visible from the start.
Make the first yes easy. Earn the next.
Predictable consulting revenue does not require an endless retainer.
It requires a clear reason for the client to make the next decision.
The Easy Entry contains the first risk and creates standalone value. The work makes progress visible. Earned Expansion turns the next important problem into a defined engagement.
Take one service you currently sell and write two lines:
1. What contained result could a client buy with little regret, even if the relationship ended there?
2. Which larger outcome might that work honestly reveal?
Do not force the second answer.
If the first engagement cannot reveal it, you have not earned it yet.
Nynch helps consultants identify the relationships and moments where valuable conversations should happen. It cannot rescue a vague offer. If you need a better way to work the network you already have, see how Nynch works
I’m also opening the book for 1 or 2 more one to one clients where we build and implement your entire business development system and implement it over 90 days to get you your next 5 clients. See if it’s a fit here